A stochastic simulation study on using different models for prediction of breeding values while changing the breeding goal.

In a stochastic simulation study the effect of simultaneously changing the model for prediction of breeding values and changing the breeding goal was studied. A population of 100 000 cows with registrations on seven traits was simulated in two steps. In the first step of 15 years the population was selected for production and mastitis occurrence using a univariate model for prediction of breeding values for production and a trivariate model using information on mastitis treatments, udder depth and somatic cell score for prediction of breeding values for mastitis occurrence. In the second step six different scenarios were set up and simulated for 15 years combining two different breeding goals and three different models for prediction of breeding values in 20 replicates. Breeding goal 1 had relative economic value per genetic standard deviation on production (19.4) and mastitis occurrence ( - 50) whereas breeding goal 2 had a economic value on production (19.4), udder depth (4.2), mastitis occurrence ( - 50), non return rate (13.0) and days open ( - 16.75). Model 1 was a model similar to the one used in the first 15 years. Model 2 was an approximate multitrait model where solutions for fixed effects from a model corresponding to model 1 were subtracted from the phenotypes and a multitrait model with an overall mean, a year effect, an additive genetic and a residual effect were applied. Model 3 was a full multitrait model. Average genetic trends for total merit and each individual trait over 20 replicates were compared for each scenario. With the number of replicates the genetic responses using model 2 and 3 were not significant different. With a broad breeding goal using, model 2 or model 3 gave a significantly higher response in total merit than using model 1. Using a narrow breeding goal there was no significant difference between models used for prediction of breeding values. Results showed that with a breeding goal with a lot of emphasis on low heritable traits with a high economic value using a multitrait methodology for prediction of breeding values will redistribute the genetic progress in the total merit index. More gain will come from the low heritable traits in the breeding goal and less from traits with higher heritability. With a broad breeding goal and exploiting the available information in the data the inbreeding coefficient increased though not significantly.